Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 8th May 2012 21:05 UTC, submitted by Francis
Thread beginning with comment 517369
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I thought most/all the OO devs had flocked to LibreOffice because of Oracle being lame, which I assume meant OO would be left to rot.
It was sort of the other way around: most of the OOo devs were paid by Oracle and when LO forked most of them lost their jobs and are not working in OO anymore. A few were hired by RedHat to work on LO and some other were hired by IBM to work on AOO but the vast majority of them are working on other things.
Both projects have been cleaning the code in orthogonal ways but AOO has been more conservative as they will bring in a lot of code from IBM's Lotus Symphony.




Member since:
2005-11-13
I thought most/all the OO devs had flocked to LibreOffice because of Oracle being lame, which I assume meant OO would be left to rot.
If they're both still being developed separately, why would somebody choose one or the other? Seems like they'd be more productive combining their efforts.