Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 25th May 2012 14:55 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 519458
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Comment by demetrioussharpe
by Soulbender on Sat 26th May 2012 10:18
in reply to "RE: Comment by demetrioussharpe"
RE[3]: Comment by demetrioussharpe
by jptros on Sun 27th May 2012 03:25
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by demetrioussharpe"
RE[3]: Comment by demetrioussharpe
by demetrioussharpe on Tue 29th May 2012 07:44
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by demetrioussharpe"
You also have two operating systems that went pretty much nowhere.
OS/2 actually DID go somewhere. Back in the early '90s, it wasn't a forgone conclusion that Windows would win the OS wars. OS/2 was largely sabotaged by it's principle developer after the MS/IBM split. That helped lead to OS/2 leaving the consumer market, but it stayed in the corporate market -doing exceptionally well in the finance & manufacturing sectors. In fact, I once saw a crashed ATM that had OS/2 installed on it an a mall in Killeen, TX at the end of the '90s.





Member since:
2005-10-02
Indeed. With a suitable object-file* oriented desktop Plan9 would rock really hard.
* Plan9 is taking the "everything-is-a-file" concept to its extreme. OS/2 took "everything-is-an-object" to an extreme. Combine those and you have "everything-is-an-object-is-a-file".