Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 25th May 2012 14:55 UTC
General Unix James Hague: "But all the little bits of complexity, all those cases where indecision caused one option that probably wasn't even needed in the first place to be replaced by two options, all those bad choices that were never remedied for fear of someone somewhere having to change a line of code... They slowly accreted until it all got out of control, and we got comfortable with systems that were impossible to understand." Counterpoint by John Cook: "Some of the growth in complexity is understandable. It's a lot easier to maintain an orthogonal design when your software isn't being used. Software that gets used becomes less orthogonal and develops diagonal shortcuts." If there's ever been a system in dire need of a complete redesign, it's UNIX and its derivatives. A mess doesn't even begin to describe it (for those already frantically reaching for the comment button, note that this applies to other systems as well).
Thread beginning with comment 519647
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Comment by kurkosdr
by kwan_e on Mon 28th May 2012 02:50 UTC in reply to "Comment by kurkosdr"
kwan_e
Member since:
2007-02-18

Assigning "/" to the hardrrive the OS is installed in and make everything else appear as a subfolder is silly. Mounting a drive to a folder should be an option, not a requirement in order to use your drives.


The UNIX filesystem was designed to be network agnostic. You're not arguing anything profound: you're just arguing for one set of conventions over another which doesn't really change anything.

The "average" user doesn't even care how drives are represented. All they want is a window that they can open for the drive, which does not matter if it uses the UNIX / convention, or the DOS drive letter convention.

Reply Parent Score: 2