Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 28th May 2012 19:25 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 519730
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Your premise is completely wrong
by radix on Mon 28th May 2012 21:39
in reply to "RE[2]: Your premise is completely wrong"
RE[4]: Your premise is completely wrong
by the_trapper on Mon 28th May 2012 23:03
in reply to "RE[3]: Your premise is completely wrong"
I'm wondering why are men discriminated in pushups and running ...
It's a simple matter of physical differences. When the scoring tables were created for the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT) they had a group of soldiers complete 2 minutes of pushups, 2 minutes of situps, and a timed 2 mile run. The results were then used to create a scoring table. They found that most women scored lower on pushups and running than their male peers.
RE[3]: Your premise is completely wrong
by looncraz on Tue 29th May 2012 17:03
in reply to "RE[2]: Your premise is completely wrong"





Member since:
2005-07-07
In the military, women do no compete against the men for their ranks or jobs. They compete entirely against other women.
I don't know what military you served in or when, but currently the United States Army does everything it can to make competition for ranks and jobs equal for each gender. The obvious exception to this is the combat arms series of professions, which has traditionally barred females completely, however, this is actually starting to change, believe it or not. Obviously there are some physical differences between males and females when it comes to their physical abilities, so they are scored on different scales when it comes to running and pushups. Situps are graded the exact same way between the two genders, and our promotion system is IDENTICAL for both genders and all professions. Weapons marksmanship is IDENTICAL for both genders as well.