To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Sadly the forethought is Ballmer's. His "vision" of one Windows running on phones up to desktops and servers is just screwy. Tablets that drop to a desktop depending on the app you run, desktop machines that force huge (and I think ugly, but that's just my view) box icons onto the screen and split apps into full-screen vs. windowed categories.
It's really impressive to see it all come together so poorly, particularly when full-screen could have been done nicely (look at Apple's Lion on laptops - full screen apps are really beautifully integrated into the virtual desktop system) and when Metro would have been fine as just a phone/tablet interface since it was optimized for that.
But hey, one Windows! Unless you run on ARM... in which case you get no legacy apps anyway plus a desktop that still needs stylus/mouse/keyboard to work. It's a lack of foresight - or just a really bad vision.




Member since:
2008-07-15
People who want tablets with walled gardens are already using iOS, and app developers are already coding for it. There's little sense in making an iOS clone with a different UI which, while completely different and arguably superior under the hood, is how Windows 8 is going to be perceived by anyone with more than a single functioning brain cell. Metro is reactionary. It's a Microsoft "me too" statement without much forethought put into it.