To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Bill Shooter of Bul,
"You suck at reading. The $99 isn't going to microsoft, its going to verisign. Not that verisign is a great company or anything, but please read before reacting."
I noticed the article was recently edited to say this, but the original article did not, so don't be too hard on the poster.
It's no secret that I oppose secure boot because it does more to promote corporate control than our security. However I do have some questions about the program:
Just who will be allowed to get a key, what are the qualifications?
Who is responsible for approving applicants?
Are any developers or end users going to be denied?
If noone is there to vet the software, then doesn't that undermine the entire "security model" behind secure boot?
Do we really know where the money goes? MS may be outsourcing this program to Verisign because they specialise in selling code certificates already, I kind of doubt the deal between MS and Verisign lets Verisign keep all the profits?
Anyone who's a member of the Microsoft Winqual program.
Verisign.
As long as their identity can be validated, no.
No, because keys can be revoked.
All the profits from a $99 identity validation? I'm sure that's significant. In reality, Microsoft subsidise the program heavily.





Member since:
2006-07-14
You suck at reading. The $99 isn't going to microsoft, its going to verisign. Not that verisign is a great company or anything, but please read before reacting.