Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 7th Jun 2012 01:59 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 521131
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[7]: Wait... am I understanding this correctly?
by Sodki on Thu 7th Jun 2012 07:04
in reply to "RE[6]: Wait... am I understanding this correctly?"
That's kind of what I'm wondering, would they have to make any changes to the distros to integrate them into the Azure system? I don't know that much about Azure so I have no idea. In the past Microsoft has shied away from Free software in part because of the restrictions of the GPL.
As much as I dislike the GPL itself, I understand its necessity and I hope Microsoft abides by it if they do have to alter the software.
As much as I dislike the GPL itself, I understand its necessity and I hope Microsoft abides by it if they do have to alter the software.
I very much doubt that they have to alter the software. They probably just have to change some configuration files.
RE[8]: Wait... am I understanding this correctly?
by Morgan on Thu 7th Jun 2012 11:57
in reply to "RE[7]: Wait... am I understanding this correctly?"
If I had to guess, I would say they would at the very least have to modify some kernel source files to roll in support for Azure-specific features, but as I said I'm not that familiar with Azure so I may be talking out of my ass.
Regardless, based on the link provided by vaette it looks like they are cooperating with the GPL and that makes me happy.
RE[7]: Wait... am I understanding this correctly?
by jessesmith on Thu 7th Jun 2012 14:34
in reply to "RE[6]: Wait... am I understanding this correctly?"
The GPL is a copyright license. It doesn't matter if they make changes to the distributions. As long as Microsoft doesn't redistribute their changes they are under no obligation to provide their source code changes. Since their service is a cloud based on (ie the distros run on their computers) the GPL does not apply.
RE[8]: Wait... am I understanding this correctly?
by Morgan on Thu 7th Jun 2012 15:19
in reply to "RE[7]: Wait... am I understanding this correctly?"
Since their service is a cloud based on (ie the distros run on their computers) the GPL does not apply.
Fair enough, but I would argue that Microsoft is still distributing the software, even if you are using it in an instanced mode. You still buy a license from Microsoft, you still use their altered version...how is that any different from the software shipping on a device or boxed in a retail store?
Regardless, as has been pointed out elsewhere Microsoft does seem to be playing by the rules.





Member since:
2005-06-29
That's kind of what I'm wondering, would they have to make any changes to the distros to integrate them into the Azure system? I don't know that much about Azure so I have no idea. In the past Microsoft has shied away from Free software in part because of the restrictions of the GPL.
As much as I dislike the GPL itself, I understand its necessity and I hope Microsoft abides by it if they do have to alter the software.