To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I see, you managed to miss how that wasn't an example, but an analogy, and not about computers ability to display them...
And I have perhaps even more telling one: Blackletter (Gothic) script, used in Germany well into XX century (I have some books in it after grandfather), just more or less Latin alphabet - but hardly readable to somebody not used to it.
Sure, it easily works properly with computers ...which doesn't change its relative ineligibility, its potential alienating qualities (if somebody would, say, switch just the fonts - not even the language - to Blackletter at your computer)
Edited 2012-06-15 23:05 UTC
Well you were the one calling it an example in your previous post.
In any case, I'm sure there are many fantastic reasons to keep around all of the thousands of languages that were spawned because of the inability of people to cover meaningful geographic distances quickly, but there are probably more reasons supporting people being able to understand each other instead.
For "analogy" (I kid...), if you post in some Khmer dialect here, you're unlikely to get many responses. It's not only not much of a market for OS vendors, it's limiting in terms of your own economic opportunities. So it goes.





Member since:
2011-08-13
That's a stupid example. Computers have worked properly with Greek and Cyrillic since what, the 80s?