Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 14th Jun 2012 22:49 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 522407
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2011-04-11
Unfortunatelty, it's not only crapware/trialware that slows down a PC. It's also the fact the installation image is "automatically generated from a database", whatever this means. This is the reason the update to SP3 failed for some XP machines back then (OEMs used the same image for Intel and AMD laptops) and probably the reason my mom's HP came with a fragmented HDD out of the box (took 1,5 hours to defrag). Or why my old compaq nx9420 boots faster with 7 than the OEM-installed XP.
Normally OEMs should install the OS by hand in the first sample of a particular model, and make the image from that. Not generate it automatically. So let's see how Vizio does woth that and what the boot times of their PCs will be before we rejoice.