To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
The problem for OEM is that to be recognized and stay relevant you need to somehow differentiate. And what is the easiest way to do that? Software layers modifications. Their thinking is simple: people acquainted with some added features may stick to them and teach others to do so too. Their failing point is that most of the things they modify/add is crap.
Probably would be wiser to invest more on build quality and services around the device but, guess what, few of them have the resources to do that and some that have are afraid because the bigger risk associated. These are precisely the Apple strong points. Also, they would compete with their front vendors, the telcos and ISP. Not an easy task if you are not that big.
So, really, if you are doing hardware and is not Apple, Samsung or perhaps some 3 to 4 others more, you do not have that much choice.
It is possible to differentiate through hardware quality and software stability though.
Until Nokia got Elop'd and fell into software madness, I used to recommend their phones for their sturdiness and the good stability/feature set equilibrium provided by s40 and Symbian for the price. Similarly, I strongly suggest friends not to buy Acer laptops due to their horrible build quality.
Edited 2012-06-25 12:24 UTC





Member since:
2005-07-08
And as I mentioned in my post, this is something OEMs will always do regardless of the OS being used.
Just look at what they are doing with Android, or did with Symbian, or the Linux distributions created for the first wave of netbooks.
They will always try to diversify somehow.