Linked by Eugenia Loli on Sat 23rd Jun 2012 20:18 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 523736
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 17:26 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 11:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:33 UTC
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
...and a static GUI with very limited number of poorly differentiated touch-buttons, complex arbitrary combinations of which give you any desired action? Also, exploding when there's something wrong at the nearest city block transformer?
BTW very-many-cores, we're getting there:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Furber#Current_research_interest...
http://apt.cs.manchester.ac.uk/projects/SpiNNaker/
WRT integrating an AI into the society... I cringe what kind of "moral values" we'll try to impose on it, the same way many humans try to do with other humans - while insisting on some silly superficialities, we might miss some really crucial ones, Asimov-style crucial*.
Because, see, since you focus on "emergent" AI - we have to take into account that the "true AI" might be, at the least, damn horny towards humans in some convoluted way
* But his books might also seem a bit naive - around the time of their writing, we already had robots dedicated to killing humans, ICBMs being the most ultimate example (some even largely autonomously, like the Russian Perimetr aka Dead Hand system)