Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 6th Jul 2012 22:42 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 525683
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Other local email clients are a point of reference and ~competition for Thunderbird, not webmails... (that you can't help mentioning and disparaging for some reason... and which are, BTW, a decent method of choice for most people, why they really picked up email in the first place)
I don't like web e-mail clients. They are laggy, and inconvenient.
If you want to spam or send 1000 000 emails/hr maybe they are laggy or inconvenient. But so are mail clients such as Thunderbird. For massive e-mail sending your best bet is to write your own e-mail client which is a trivial task.
For normal e-mail usage patterns I find web based e-mail to be very convenient. In fact, in last 14 years (when I got access to Net first time) I used exclusively web clients for sending and receiving emails. That way I can store my mails online, access my e-mails from anywhere, search tens of thousands of e-mails very easy and fast.
The only concern I see for web based e-mails is privacy. But since I don't use mail for selling heroin, cocain and weapons is not a big concern to me. And even if I were selling weapons online, I would probably encrypt my e-mails and use IP address obfuscation.




Member since:
2010-06-08
I don't like web e-mail clients. They are laggy, and inconvenient. Hopefully this "freeze" doesn't mean they won't fix major bugs anymore. Like this annoying bug for example:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=609346
It's a pity though they won't work on adding more features, like Carddav support and so on:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=546932