Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 21st Jul 2012 23:06 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 527850
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Whining because they are Apple fanboys?
by Lennie on Tue 24th Jul 2012 06:44
in reply to "RE[2]: Whining because they are Apple fanboys?"
RE[3]: Whining because they are Apple fanboys?
by kenji on Wed 25th Jul 2012 20:35
in reply to "RE[2]: Whining because they are Apple fanboys?"
The important thing to remember is that the OS is using BSD-licensed stuff under the hood. That means it was open source, but isn't any more.
The BSD is far too permissive, and doesn't protect software. I'm surprised it's considered an Open-as-in-Free license at all sometimes. "Please plagiarize my code and call it your own! I'm begging you!"
The BSD is far too permissive, and doesn't protect software. I'm surprised it's considered an Open-as-in-Free license at all sometimes. "Please plagiarize my code and call it your own! I'm begging you!"
Plagiarism implies theft.
Under the BSD license, the code is freely available and the license requires the original BSD licensee to be properly given credit. The BSD license is, in fact, a free/open license; it is just more closed source friendly.
RE[3]: Whining because they are Apple fanboys?
by Soulbender on Wed 25th Jul 2012 20:58
in reply to "RE[2]: Whining because they are Apple fanboys?"
That means it was open source, but isn't any more.
Err no. It means the original code is still open source but there might be changes done and used by Apple that isn't open source.
The BSD is far too permissive, and doesn't protect software
Says you but fortunately that's only your opinion and you don't get to decide on this for anyone else. It's none of your business how anyone else license their code.
I'm surprised it's considered an Open-as-in-Free license at all sometimes.
I'm not surprised but maybe that's because I don't feel a need to force my choice of license on everyone else.
"Please plagiarize my code and call it your own! I'm begging you!"
It's not plagiarism. Do you even know what that is?
Edited 2012-07-25 20:59 UTC




Member since:
2012-07-23
The important thing to remember is that the OS is using BSD-licensed stuff under the hood. That means it was open source, but isn't any more.
The BSD is far too permissive, and doesn't protect software. I'm surprised it's considered an Open-as-in-Free license at all sometimes. "Please plagiarize my code and call it your own! I'm begging you!"