Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 25th Jul 2012 22:18 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 528299
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-13
It started out with no "directory structure" to organize your documents in, only tags allowed.
It kept evolving until almost all features of "filesystem-based" folders were back in.
Reason is simple: some people like searching for stuff, some people like browsing for it.
I think that having folder-based browsing adds extra value as well, even for people who like searching more.
Take a shared-file-dump scenario:
- you can learn which "types of content" exist without having to search (drill-down through folders === get a list of tags)
- you learn how to tag your content (by deciding where to save it) instead of creating 25 variations of the same tag to express the same concept
The main problem for this is that different people would naturally organize content in different ways, and might have a hard time adapting to other people's views. And some are messy by nature.