Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 25th Jul 2012 22:18 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 528391
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Oliver has lost it.
by zima on Wed 1st Aug 2012 23:56
in reply to "RE[3]: Oliver has lost it."
With Linux/Unix and DOS, the organization makes sense
And yet not a long time ago there was an article documenting how little sense it has, lots of weird historical baggage... http://www.osnews.com/story/25556/Understanding_the_bin_sbin_usr_bi...
(and of course religious war in the comments)
Edited 2012-08-02 00:07 UTC




Member since:
2006-11-12
The basic difference between the hierarchal models of Linux/Unix systems and DOS is is very simple:
- with Linux/Unix, all devices, files and folders are contained within the root partition;
- with DOS, all partitions/devices exist together at the root level, and one does not contain another.
Other than a couple of exceptions (GoboLinux, etc.), Linux/Unix perpetrates no "obfuscation" of the type that phoenix explains is inherent in post Windows 3.x systems.
With Linux/Unix and DOS, the organization makes sense and nothing is "pseudo" (but some things are "sudo").
OSX is possibly the worst offender, in that it tries to completely hide the system directories from the user, which additionally makes things more complex in regards to how the system files are actually handled internally.
Of course, GoboLinux also hid the system directories from the user, but it was much more open and straightforward about it. Also, the GoboLinux method went further than OSX in coordinating the hidden and non-hidden sections, and the GoboLinux links system certainly was much better suited to an eventual elimination of the hidden section.