Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 14th Aug 2012 22:17 UTC
PDAs, Cellphones, Wireless You wouldn't believe it, but something actually, truly interesting came out of the Apple vs. Samsung lawsuit yesterday. Apple had conducted a survey to find out why, exactly, consumers opted to go with Android instead of the iPhone. The results are fascinating - not only do they seem to invalidate Apple's claims, they provide an unusual insight into consumer behaviour. The gist? People choose Android not because it's an iPhone copy - they choose it because of Android's unique characteristics.
Thread beginning with comment 531207
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Not convinced
by puenktchen on Wed 15th Aug 2012 12:30 UTC in reply to "RE: Not convinced"
Member since:

"If Android phones were all $200 then you wouldn't see as many people buying them for these reasons.

When you say $200 you don't actually mean $200 right? You probably mean 200$ + 600$ in hidden costs.

Still, you can get unlocked Android phones which are just good enough(tm) for just 100€ in germany, no contract needed, and that includes 19% vat (I'm thinking of the Huawei Ascend Y200). The Iphone 3GS starts at 340€. As Samsung Galaxy S3 with 32 GB costs 600€, a Iphone 4gs with 32 GB 740€. Not as drastic, but still quite a difference. If they had included the option "because it was cheaper", I'd guess 95% would have ticked it.

Reply Parent Score: 3