Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 21st Aug 2012 21:57 UTC
Windows With Windows 8 right around the corner, the usual game of reading the end-user license agreements and spotting the different versions is in full swing. Usually, this is a game of ridicule as Microsoft comes up with ever more convoluted version schemes and EULA terms. This time around, though, the company seems to be taking steps to make things easier, as Ed Bott reports.
Thread beginning with comment 531968
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: MS licensing = time sink
by ilovebeer on Fri 24th Aug 2012 04:37 UTC in reply to "MS licensing = time sink"
ilovebeer
Member since:
2011-08-08

Am I glad I don't use Windows! I can't imagine wasting time on decoding MS licensing schemes every release.

You'd spend less time doing that than you would dealing with the constant breakage in linux. Assuming you're a linux user of course.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[2]: MS licensing = time sink
by leech on Fri 24th Aug 2012 12:59 in reply to "RE: MS licensing = time sink"
leech Member since:
2006-01-10

"Am I glad I don't use Windows! I can't imagine wasting time on decoding MS licensing schemes every release.

You'd spend less time doing that than you would dealing with the constant breakage in linux. Assuming you're a linux user of course.
"

Normally I wouldn't feed the troll, but figured I will because it's early enough...

Linux is creaming Windows in the server space because it breaks all the time.

I've had an Arch Linux (yup, that's right, a rolling release) running on my desktop for the last 4 years without a reinstall.

Yet Windows Server 2003 will sometimes randomly remove an active directory account. Did it to the manager once, was pretty funny.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[2]: MS licensing = time sink
by andih on Sat 25th Aug 2012 22:15 in reply to "RE: MS licensing = time sink"
andih Member since:
2010-03-27

There is no constant breakage in linux,, windows crashes a lot lot lot more often ;)

Never ever used less time on caring for my OS then after switching to linux.

Not counting the first half year I was using it though.. there was contstant breakage yes.., but NOT because of linux ;)

Linux is pretty buff, and extremely stable.
Less resource demanding, more stable and less costly than whatever comes with the windows NT kernel.

Windows is a dinosaur, and I hope it dies soon.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[3]: MS licensing = time sink
by zima on Tue 28th Aug 2012 20:36 in reply to "RE[2]: MS licensing = time sink"
zima Member since:
2005-07-06

Snap out of the last century, with its then-popular crashy win9x line (oh, and let's not forget how Linux was also more... "fun" back then)

Hope all you want, but the still significant growth in PC numbers is fuelled almost exclusively by Windows PCs. Which for the majority of normal users might very well be a less costly solution (including time invested, familiarity) - and people hardly pay for Windows anyway, it comes installed on a new machine (with low-priced OEM license), and they usually use the version it came with until that machine breaks down. Also, any PC sold for quite a few years is powerful enough so that any hypothetical "less resource demanding" (which necessitates tinkering and/or going with more niche, less polished distros & DEs) doesn't matter.
(and that doesn't even touches how some software categories - NLE for example - are very nice on Windows and quite rubbish on Linux...)

Reply Parent Score: 2