Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 24th Aug 2012 23:54 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 532104
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: spreading FUD because you failed in judgement?
by kyousefi on Sat 25th Aug 2012 10:09
in reply to "RE: spreading FUD because you failed in judgement?"
RE[3]: spreading FUD because you failed in judgement?
by Thom_Holwerda on Sat 25th Aug 2012 10:17
in reply to "RE[2]: spreading FUD because you failed in judgement?"
newton
Not the first graphical, touchscreen PDA (Palm's Zoomer was the first), and by far not the most successful - it was a major flop.
PowerBook
A laptop.
Macintosh
Overpriced (compare to the Amiga) less capable version of Xerox' work. Game changer for sure, but hardly innovative.
quick take
Invented and built by Kodak and Fujifilm. Digital photography is older than Apple itself.
mac OS
See Macintosh. The only successful homegrown operating system Apple has ever built, which they completely neglected for years until they became the laughing stock of the industry.
iPod
Fantastic device, but in the end, just a music player.
iPhone
Fantastic device, but as a heavy former PDA user, kind of 'meh'.
Apple in a nutshell: great devices, made possible because of industry progress and copying others. I actually applaud that - it's just that Apple believes it should be the only one allowed to stand on the shoulders of giants.
RE[3]: spreading FUD because you failed in judgement?
by Soulbender on Sat 25th Aug 2012 10:20
in reply to "RE[2]: spreading FUD because you failed in judgement?"
So, you think the refrigerator maker company is the company with original ideas
I don't see what them making refrigerators has anything to do with this.
newton, PowerBook, Macintosh, quick take, mac OS, iPod and iPhone is the copy cat?
None of these are original ideas. Good products perhaps but not original ideas.





Member since:
2010-03-11
Except that's not what happened. It would be more like if Nike hadn't gotten any trademarks and this mike company went and registered some and then sued Nike and won.