To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Rather than arguing about how ridiculous Apple's patents are, I'll just point out that there should be a clause in patent laws that specifies that a year or so after competitors have started to widely use the patented invention in commercial products, if the patent holder has done nothing about it, the patent must be invalidated.
Otherwise, what you get is people silently patenting random stuff, waiting until it has fallen in widespread use, and only then asserting their patent holder rights. This does nothing more for innovation than immediate litigation, and only help companies that want to engage in downright anticompetitive behaviours such as patent trolling or achieving monopolies on de facto standards.
If companies have to litigate immediately instead, such legal backstabbing becomes impossible. They must show immediately what kind of crap they have patented, and competitors can smoothly reinvent the wheel before people have become used to the original one.
Edited 2012-08-25 20:54 UTC





Member since:
2010-03-08
So, now patents on universally established UI and design conventions like pinch and zoom or rounded rects are enforceable in the US ?
Guess I just have to buy the patent for patent abuse, then
Edited 2012-08-25 09:24 UTC