To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Snap out of the last century, with its then-popular crashy win9x line (oh, and let's not forget how Linux was also more... "fun" back then)
Hope all you want, but the still significant growth in PC numbers is fuelled almost exclusively by Windows PCs. Which for the majority of normal users might very well be a less costly solution (including time invested, familiarity) - and people hardly pay for Windows anyway, it comes installed on a new machine (with low-priced OEM license), and they usually use the version it came with until that machine breaks down. Also, any PC sold for quite a few years is powerful enough so that any hypothetical "less resource demanding" (which necessitates tinkering and/or going with more niche, less polished distros & DEs) doesn't matter.
(and that doesn't even touches how some software categories - NLE for example - are very nice on Windows and quite rubbish on Linux...)




Member since:
2010-03-27
There is no constant breakage in linux,, windows crashes a lot lot lot more often
Never ever used less time on caring for my OS then after switching to linux.
Not counting the first half year I was using it though.. there was contstant breakage yes.., but NOT because of linux
Linux is pretty buff, and extremely stable.
Less resource demanding, more stable and less costly than whatever comes with the windows NT kernel.
Windows is a dinosaur, and I hope it dies soon.