Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 24th Aug 2012 23:54 UTC
Legal And just like that, within a matter of days, the jury has reached a verdict in Apple vs. Samsung. The basic gist is simple: Apple's software patents are valid, and many Samsung devices infringe upon them. Apple's iPhone 3G trade dress is valid, and Samsung's Galaxy S line infringes, but other devices did not. Samsung did not infringe Apple's iPad design patent. Apple did not infringe any of Samsung's patents. Apple is awarded a little over $1 billion in damages. Competition lost today, and developers in the United States should really start to get worried - software patents got validated big time today.
Thread beginning with comment 532392
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Comment by Morgan
by Lennie on Sun 26th Aug 2012 11:55 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by Morgan"
Lennie
Member since:
2007-09-22

I think the real problem is, even if all people who understand the industry a bit and think the same would stop buying from these manufacturers the impact for the manufacturers would be hardly significant.

But, I do think it would be a significant amount of buying power which could be used to fund other companies/project which do want to do the right thing.

Just look at what the FreedomBox Foundation adchieved:

"The fundraising drive was set up on February 17, with the goal of getting $60,000 in donations in 30 days, but it has exceeded that—and quickly. As of this writing, there are more than 650 supporters who have donated over $64,000 in just five or six days."

Reply Parent Score: 2