Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 29th Aug 2012 22:52 UTC
Linux Miguel de Icaza: "To sum up: (a) First dimension: things change too quickly, breaking both open source and proprietary software alike; (b) incompatibility across Linux distributions. This killed the ecosystem for third party developers trying to target Linux on the desktop. You would try once, do your best effort to support the 'top' distro or if you were feeling generous 'the top three' distros. Only to find out that your software no longer worked six months later. Supporting Linux on the desktop became a burden for independent developers." Mac OS X came along to scoop up the Linux defectors.
Thread beginning with comment 533094
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
WorknMan
Member since:
2005-11-13

And the relevant fact is that there has never existed Linux versions of very popular applications like AutoCAD or Photoshop, to mention just two best sellers.


Well yeah, of course. But a big reason why this is so is because of the stuff the he points out, which will never be fixed, because too many Linux Evangelists are convinced that having 900 different distros competing with each other is a good thing. And, well.... maybe it IS a good thing, but not if you want people to actually use it. And those of us who don't use it have been pointing out the same issues as Icaza for over a decade, but nobody listens to us. Hence, the reason why desktop Linux has been such a spectacular failure, and will continue to be so. Hell, most Android variants can utilize the same app store, and even still people are pissed at the fragmentation.

Reply Parent Score: 5

cdude Member since:
2008-09-21

The problem is not that 900 distributions compete with each other. As Miguel pointed out the problem is incompatibility even in versions of only one (or the 3 top) distributions. He goes on to name (indirect) Red Hat, PulseAudio and Systemd as examples.

Those backwards-compatibility breaks are indeed serious and omnipresent. It seems like every 6 months a shiny new thing replaces working stuff in the stack and breaks compatibility all along. The gain is minimal compared to the lose.

Reply Parent Score: 1