Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 29th Aug 2012 22:52 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 533460
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[9]: Comment by woegjiub
by gilboa on Fri 31st Aug 2012 18:37
in reply to "RE[8]: Comment by woegjiub"
You have to use the signature override
http://www.ngohq.com/home.php?page=dseo
A fair point but not a big deal
http://www.ngohq.com/home.php?page=dseo
A fair point but not a big deal
1. Signature override (of any [1] type) will not work w/ SecureBoot.
2. My personal experience w/ signature override is *far* less than stellar. Let alone the fact that it forces my users to jump through hopes to use my non-certified drivers.
I believe I proved my point: The lack of a stable driver API in Linux has a very, very limited effect on both in-tree and out-of-tree developers. More, I believe that I also proved my point the Windows kernel development can be just as annoying, if not worse due to specific Windows limitations (Signatures, API changes between different SP releases, etc).
- Gilboa




Member since:
2012-06-22
You have to use the signature override
http://www.ngohq.com/home.php?page=dseo
A fair point but not a big deal