Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 30th Aug 2012 17:43 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 533495
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: More irony (though more loosely related)
by Johann Chua on Sat 1st Sep 2012 10:31
in reply to "RE: More irony (though more loosely related)"
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/15/13 23:03 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-12-16
Apple could not use intel chips before 2006.
simple reason: Mac OS was not CPU agnostic.
Mac OS X was. (but it came 5 years later.)
...beside fact that Intel only match SIMD part of Motorola/Apple (4 years old) AltiVec with SSE2...