Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 4th Sep 2012 09:00 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 533883
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: There are devs with that many devices...
by Radio on Wed 5th Sep 2012 06:09
in reply to "RE[5]: There are devs with that many devices..."
Isn't it a little convenient that of all the FBI employees the one that gets supposedly hacked is the one person who the public knows about?
Few people outside the hacking community knew about this guy. What you call suspiciously "convenient" is... well, rather obvious. FBI agent stars in a stupid ad, FBI agent gets targeted.
Hmm...what is it we call those people again?. Oh yeah, attention whores.
Attention whores, but with 12 million UDID and personal data. Not bad, eh?
RE[7]: There are devs with that many devices...
by Soulbender on Wed 5th Sep 2012 06:40
in reply to "RE[6]: There are devs with that many devices..."
Attention whores, but with 12 million UDID and personal data. Not bad, eh?
And how do you know there are 12 million?
Hey, you know what? I have 50 million UDID's that I got from a DoD laptop. Want proof? Oh well, just look at the ones already released, they're in my list to. Trust me, I have 50.





Member since:
2005-08-18
Claiming stuff is easy, especially when whatever you claim is bound to get headlines. Providing actual proof is harder.
Isn't it a little convenient that of all the FBI employees the one that gets supposedly hacked is the one person who the public knows about?
From the article:
Hmm...what is it we call those people again?. Oh yeah, attention whores.