Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 4th Sep 2012 20:04 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
Thread beginning with comment 534098
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[10]: Are these languages going to get any traction? Ever?
by moondevil on Fri 7th Sep 2012 07:36
in reply to "RE[9]: Are these languages going to get any traction? Ever?"
"[q][q]This complaint can also be addressed to Ada, Modula-3, Delphi, C#, Scala, Lisp, Haskell, ML...
Lisp? Seriously? "
While Lisp in itself is very simple, it can be used to express very complex architectures, specially when heavy use of macros is done.
[/q]Yes, but that's not a language issue, so this is out of topic. [/q]
How come is this not a language issue, if you still making use of the same language?
If you are doing cool meta-programming tricks with CLOS does it stop being Lisp just because a big part of CLOS is usually done with macros?
"[q]... C++ is a monster...
I prefer to think that it is a language for people that known how to program. "Programmers using sane tool such as Ada or OCaml also know "how to program" but they're wise enough to avoid C++.. [/q]
If they can restrict themselves to aeronautics or financial market projects then yes, otherwise they are just loosing project opportunities.
RE[11]: Are these languages going to get any traction? Ever?
by satsujinka on Fri 7th Sep 2012 08:44
in reply to "RE[10]: Are these languages going to get any traction? Ever?"





Member since:
2005-07-06
Lisp? Seriously? "
While Lisp in itself is very simple, it can be used to express very complex architectures, specially when heavy use of macros is done.
[/q]Yes, but that's not a language issue, so this is out of topic.
I prefer to think that it is a language for people that known how to program. "Programmers using sane tool such as Ada or OCaml also know "how to program" but they're wise enough to avoid C++..