Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 14th Sep 2012 22:30 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 535284
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Read the article dammit
by Neolander on Mon 17th Sep 2012 09:23
in reply to "RE[2]: Read the article dammit"
Or is it because x86 is just a battery guzzler, and no matter what it's stupid to be using it in situations where power resources are highly limited?
But, well, lets morph this thing into something it was never designed to be, because oh no, we can't let better architectures like ARM and MIPS do their thing and compete where they technically mop the floor with us. No, no, no--we need to start invading their territory, even if in the end the customers lose with shittier battery life due to the x86/Windows combination.
But, well, lets morph this thing into something it was never designed to be, because oh no, we can't let better architectures like ARM and MIPS do their thing and compete where they technically mop the floor with us. No, no, no--we need to start invading their territory, even if in the end the customers lose with shittier battery life due to the x86/Windows combination.
Well, I for one wouldn't mind seeing some serious competition to ARM in the embedded space. Among other things, that could perhaps make them consider making their architecture more developer-friendly, so that there is no need to work on one separate OS build per supported ARM device.
RE[4]: Read the article dammit
by UltraZelda64 on Mon 17th Sep 2012 22:42
in reply to "RE[3]: Read the article dammit"




Member since:
2006-12-05
Or is it because x86 is just a battery guzzler, and no matter what it's stupid to be using it in situations where power resources are highly limited?
But, well, lets morph this thing into something it was never designed to be, because oh no, we can't let better architectures like ARM and MIPS do their thing and compete where they technically mop the floor with us. No, no, no--we need to start invading their territory, even if in the end the customers lose with shittier battery life due to the x86/Windows combination.
Edited 2012-09-16 01:21 UTC