Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 16th Sep 2012 16:53 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 535335
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
In what way does Google sound like Oracle and Microsoft? Why does it make you giggle?
1. Oracle sued saying Google forked Java and making an incompatible version. Now Google is saying the same about this Chineese company.
2. Microsoft used to do the same to their OEM's if they tried to sell any other OS.
1. Oracle sued saying Google forked Java and making an incompatible version. Now Google is saying the same about this Chineese company.
Google didn't sue Acer. They merely reminded them of their contractual obligations that come as part of being a member of the Open Handset Alliance. If Acer persisted, they'd have been kicked out of the OHA.
2. Microsoft used to do the same to their OEM's if they tried to sell any other OS.
Microsoft never sued any of their OEMs because of what you say either.
Edited 2012-09-16 21:49 UTC
2. Microsoft used to do the same to their OEM's if they tried to sell any other OS.
I think in order for this to compare directly, a Linux vendor would have to ship Linux with a version of Wine on top, and an app store that had pirated Windows apps in it.
I can appreciate what Google is doing here; it's a hybrid approach between '100% open' and the iOS walled garden. If they didn't exercise some sort of control, you'd have the phone equivalent of Linux on the desktop, and we all know how successful that was





Member since:
2010-01-11
In what way does Google sound like Oracle and Microsoft? Why does it make you giggle?