Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 20th Sep 2012 22:22 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 536064
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Its mostly happened
by jeffb on Sat 22nd Sep 2012 17:35
in reply to "RE: Its mostly happened"
RE[3]: Its mostly happened
by ilovebeer on Sat 22nd Sep 2012 18:03
in reply to "RE[2]: Its mostly happened"
Taking IDC numbers for example for 2Q
2011 vs 2010 growth 11.2%
2012 vs. 2011 growth -1.%
2010 vs. 2009 btw was over 14%
So we are talking (2012 isn't over) something like 30-60m less PCs sold this year than would have happened without the tablet based fall off.
2011 vs 2010 growth 11.2%
2012 vs. 2011 growth -1.%
2010 vs. 2009 btw was over 14%
So we are talking (2012 isn't over) something like 30-60m less PCs sold this year than would have happened without the tablet based fall off.
You're confusing people not upgrading their PCs as often due to no need (which has happening before tablets hit the scene), with people replacing PCs with tablets -- which they are not. As much as you want to believe tablets are smashing PC sales, the facts just don't support it. When cherry-picking a bit here or there is the only way to give the impression that your claim is supported, there's something wrong with your claim.





Member since:
2011-08-08
Just one slight problem with your comment... It's not true. PC sales remain consistent and have seen very little impact due to tablets. People are not replacing PC purchases with tablet purchases. The theory that PC sales are being "deeply cut into" by anything is simply not supported by any facts.