Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 22nd Sep 2012 22:07 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 536108
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
"Freedom is removed from Ubuntu
Exactly how does this remove any freedom from Ubuntu?
they could learn a thing or two from the market segment leaders like IBM, Red Hat
Ah, so they should create an enterprise product that is partly closed source and relies on Windows? "
So you admit that you too are confused when it comes to Open Source, Linux, and FSF? Not surprising as many are.
Relies on Window? In what universe does RHEL rely on Windows? They are interoperable in the Enterprise space but dependent and reliant? Where does IBM rely on Microsoft? Again, the Power Series with AIX & GNU/Linux are interoperable with Windows, but reliant and dependent? WTF are you smoking?!
Closed source? AIX is Unix not Linux but the Linux portion of IBM's services is Open Source. I run Scientific Linux which is from RHEL - in other words, Open Source. IBM & Red Hat know how to sell services and keep their divisions apart, make changes much more conservatively as any large business should, and are not run by 'personalities'.
Facts be damned eh, if it goes against your 'world-view' or chosen tech religion?
RE[6]: It's just a lens
by Soulbender on Sun 23rd Sep 2012 05:08
in reply to "RE[5]: It's just a lens"





Member since:
2005-08-18
Exactly how does this remove any freedom from Ubuntu?
Ah, so they should create an enterprise product that is partly closed source and relies on Windows?