Linked by thesunnyk on Sun 23rd Sep 2012 22:14 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 536250
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Dynamic Desktop = Activities?
by thesunnyk on Mon 24th Sep 2012 13:35
in reply to "Dynamic Desktop = Activities?"
That sounds pretty neat. Before I wrote this review I was actually in the process of moving to KDE from Unity. Then I thought I should use Gnome 3 in earnest to try and explain to myself exactly why I didn't like it.
KDE's always sounded better technically, but it always felt like a steep learning curve. Coupled with the fact that their desktop themes always look only just slightly askew, I never really took the plunge (except for the really early days on a slackware distro). Kubuntu has also been a bit of a bastard child of Ubuntu, not receiving enough love. I might want to try using KDE for a few months and see how it is.




Member since:
2008-11-25
This feature which has been described as incomplete, but with the potential to become a killer has been in KDE4 for a couple of years now.
Activities allow one to group apps and documents, save and pause the activities, stop the activity and relaunch it later, etc...
I'm unsure if GNOME knew about this very prominent KDE feature, but it seems as though they are not developing a feature which will differentiate them and allow them to be seen as unique and excellent for having it, but rather making the feature common amongst the two largest desktops, making anything without it seem lacking.
KDE also has the history by default through krunner and nepomuk/strigi, as well as having more advanced monitor and window management.
It seems as though, everything they are moving towards is already possible with KDE, and KDE have done it without removing features, but rather by adding them.
Edited 2012-09-24 06:41 UTC