Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 2nd Oct 2012 00:05 UTC
Multimedia, AV "On October 1 1982, Joel's sixth studio album, 52nd Street, was the first commercially released CD album... Which means CDs are 30-years-old today. It's worth noting here that 52nd Street wasn't a new album - it was launched initially in 1978, but it was selected for relaunch on the new digital audio disc, rolling out alongside the first CD player - the Sony CDP-101 - in Japan. But of course, the CD didn't spring up overnight - the road to launch started long before 1982." I'm still 100% CD when it comes to music. The act of physically holding a new album in your hands for the first time and gently placing the disk in the tray can't be matched by pressing a download button behind a computer.
Thread beginning with comment 537316
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Comment by kwan_e
by Richard Dale on Tue 2nd Oct 2012 12:52 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by kwan_e"
Richard Dale
Member since:
2005-07-22

"Of course, the files will be larger.

..the equipment and content will be more expensive, and the actual quality will be worse: http://people.xiph.org/~xiphmont/demo/neil-young.html
"

Oh gosh someone on the internet has written a rant about 24/192 digital music - it must be true!

Reply Parent Score: 0

RE[5]: Comment by kwan_e
by rjamorim on Tue 2nd Oct 2012 13:44 in reply to "RE[4]: Comment by kwan_e"
rjamorim Member since:
2005-12-05

Not just "someone", Monty is the creator of Ogg Vorbis. He surely knows more about digital audio than you can ever hope to understand.

Reply Parent Score: 5

RE[5]: Comment by kwan_e
by some1 on Tue 2nd Oct 2012 19:54 in reply to "RE[4]: Comment by kwan_e"
some1 Member since:
2010-10-05

someone on the internet

If you don't know who Monty is this tells more about you than about him.

has written a rant

Your comment is rant. Monty's piece can be published in a respectable journal.

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[6]: Comment by kwan_e
by Richard Dale on Wed 3rd Oct 2012 11:00 in reply to "RE[5]: Comment by kwan_e"
Richard Dale Member since:
2005-07-22

"someone on the internet

If you don't know who Monty is this tells more about you than about him.

has written a rant

Your comment is rant. Monty's piece can be published in a respectable journal.
"

Of course I know who the guy is, and he certainly knows a lot about lossy codecs. But he's hardly the best guy to have an unbiased opinion about HiRes uncompressed digital audio. The are plenty of good technical reasons to believe why Red Book 16/44.1 isn't good enough and why 24/192 is better. For example, CD needs a 20Khz brickwall filter to work which has side effects well into the audio band at half the frequency.

Reply Parent Score: 1