Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 3rd Oct 2012 01:41 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
Thread beginning with comment 537426
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: How it should be done
by dnebdal on Thu 4th Oct 2012 08:24
in reply to "RE[2]: How it should be done"
It's immensely satisfying when it finally works, so go for it.
Admittedly, that's true for any project where you can validate your code against existing real-world implementations - there's a moment of joy the first time you actually manage to parse an image/the ELF headers/what have you - and the first time you make a font file that appears with the right names in all OSes.
Tip: Microsoft's font validator made things easier. ( http://www.microsoft.com/typography/fontvalidator.mspx ). I still haven't found anything that will validate the CFF block, though - and that's the messiest part.
Edited 2012-10-04 08:26 UTC




Member since:
2007-02-18
You've piqued my interest and I'll probably try it. I pretty much have the same experience with the PDF parser, in that Adobe "standards" "documentation" is really poor and all over the place.
The good thing about RFCs is that they do make it easy to look for references.