Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 5th Oct 2012 10:45 UTC

Thread beginning with comment 537638
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[9]: The real tribute...
by MOS6510 on Fri 5th Oct 2012 14:14
in reply to "RE[8]: The real tribute..."
Court cases aren't about if someone did or didn't do something, but if what they did is illegal and can this be proven beyond reasonable doubt.
Samsung had loads of documents where they planned on making their products look more like Apple's, even Google objected to this. Anyone can see where Samsung got their inspiration, but the question is if it's illegal or not.
RE[10]: The real tribute...
by Thom_Holwerda on Fri 5th Oct 2012 14:27
in reply to "RE[9]: The real tribute..."
Samsung had loads of documents where they planned on making their products look more like Apple's,
You're twisting the truth again. The document did not state "make it look like iPhone". It said "this is where the iPhone look better. Here's some suggestions for making our product better".
You'd think Apple's lawyers would follow up with a document stating which of these suggestions were implemented. For some curious reason, they did not - and neither has anyone else. So, we actually don't know how much of the suggestions were *actually* implemented. Maybe none, maybe all, but probably, somewhere in between. And then, we need to know how many of the implemented suggestions actually copied the iPhone, and how many were different.
RE[9]: The real tribute...
by jared_wilkes on Fri 5th Oct 2012 20:25
in reply to "RE[8]: The real tribute..."
Member since:
2005-06-29
Your opinion is not fact. Apple has lost most court cases, so not even the courts are with you on that one. That's where the error in your thinking lies.