Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 8th Oct 2012 22:11 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 537892
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
The FACT is that they produced a giant document which had a side by side comparison of a current Samsung device and an iPhone and suggested - in writing - that specific functionality should be effectively replicated.
Uh, no. You clearly didn't look at the document at all. It's a comparison. With suggestions. Nothing about whether or not they were implemented - and to boot, many of the suggestions were not "copy the iPhone", but something like "make it more lively" or other vague shit like that.
The fact that Apple's lawyers have not produced a document which details which of these suggestions were implemented and in what way tells you all you need to know.




Member since:
2006-01-01
The question of whether of not Samsung actually gave 'an order' to copy anything is a matter of conjecture.
The FACT is that they produced a giant document which had a side by side comparison of a current Samsung device and an iPhone and suggested - in writing - that specific functionality should be effectively replicated.
You can argue that they were being 'inspired' by the iPhone or some shit like that but the FACT is that they followed some of those recommendations so someone had to given an 'order' to do that.