Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 8th Oct 2012 22:11 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 537965
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: The proof is in the pudding
by aldo on Tue 9th Oct 2012 16:38
in reply to "RE[2]: The proof is in the pudding"
No. This meeting was in February of 2010, a month before the launch of the Samsung Galaxy S. The Galaxy S was certainly already developed but there was no audience response of "perceived failings." What is being accused is that the Galaxy S is the first phone that takes this new direction, not that it comparably fails to hold up to the iPhone as previous generations of Samsung products between 2007 and 2010.
I've just checked and the document Thom's talking about is the comparison between the Galaxy S and the iPhone that I was thinking of.
So what's being claimed by the Apple crowd is that the copycat phone was produced before the document that urged the development of the copycat phone...
The result of the document is presumably the Galaxy S2 - not a copy of the iPhone and the phone that catapulted Samsung to Android domination.
RE[4]: The proof is in the pudding
by jared_wilkes on Tue 9th Oct 2012 16:51
in reply to "RE[3]: The proof is in the pudding"
So what's being claimed by the Apple crowd is that the copycat phone was produced before the document that urged the development of the copycat phone...
No, "the anti-Apple crowd" is claiming that this document is Apple's proof that Samsung issued a command to copy (or at least this is Thom's claim -- PJ's claim is more nuanced).
The Apple crowd is claiming that this document was submitted as one piece of evidence among many other pieces of evidence contributing to a legal argument and narrative that demonstrates that Samsung did not have designs (particularly UX) that were obviously or coincidentally like the iPhone prior to 2010 and certainly not prior to the iPhone.
Edited 2012-10-09 16:51 UTC





Member since:
2011-04-25
No. This meeting was in February of 2010, a month before the launch of the Samsung Galaxy S. The Galaxy S was certainly already developed but there was no audience response of "perceived failings." What is being accused is that the Galaxy S is the first phone that takes this new direction, not that it comparably fails to hold up to the iPhone as previous generations of Samsung products between 2007 and 2010.
Edited 2012-10-09 16:27 UTC