Linked by on Thu 18th Oct 2012 22:02 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 539301
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Motorola and carriers
by WorknMan on Sun 21st Oct 2012 04:50
in reply to "RE: Motorola and carriers"
The carriers heavily subsidize the phone price which makes it hard for manufacturers to push back against bloatware.
Right, which was my whole point. If we're supposed to blame the carriers for the bloatware on phones, then where are all those stock Android tablets, with unlocked bootloaders? For the most part, carriers don't have anything to do with tablets, so there's no reason for vendors to skin them, right.
RE[3]: Motorola and carriers
by kurkosdr on Sun 21st Oct 2012 17:19
in reply to "RE[2]: Motorola and carriers"




Member since:
2006-05-12
The carriers heavily subsidize the phone price which makes it hard for manufacturers to push back against bloatware.
Verizon/ATT sell phones at $200 or $250 that retail for over $500. If you play hard ball with them as a phone manufacturer they can just threaten to sell your phone at the $500 retail price.
The $650 32G Verizon Galaxy S3 Developer Edition (without the locked bootloader) is a perfect example of this. For $400 in savings I'd rather unlock the bootloader and root my standard Verizon S3.