Linked by Howard Fosdick on Mon 22nd Oct 2012 04:51 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 539794
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Arch was the first distro to make me truly put Slack aside, but after the recent aggressive changes I felt the need to revert once again to good old stable Slackware.
Sounds familiar. I was on Arch for the past few years and suffered niggling breakages now and then. Still, those were fixable and were no sweat off my back using the commandline. However, the aforementioned changes this summer completely broke my three-year Arch install and I'm now looking for a new home. I may look into Slackware.
I'd recommend it. You'll miss pacman, but compiling slackbuilds is very similar to rolling your own packages from the AUR, so it shouldn't be that hard. You'll have to resolve dependencies yourself, but that makes for some recovered sanity in my book.
Enjoy the stability and Zen. 





Member since:
2005-06-29
You sound like me. I started out with Red Hat, it came bundled with a book on learning Linux. After a week of frustration I gave up on it and tried Corel, which I paid for after finding out it came with WordPerfect (we were using WordPerfect in college during that time). Corel was great in most areas but wasn't very stable. I found out about Slackware and that was the distro I stayed with until the first Ubuntu release many years later.
Ubuntu really opened my eyes to the world of apt, and I tried out a lot of Debian based distros over the years, but I always ended up back on Slackware. Arch was the first distro to make me truly put Slack aside, but after the recent aggressive changes I felt the need to revert once again to good old stable Slackware.