Linked by martini on Tue 23rd Oct 2012 22:02 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 539799
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Comment by stabbyjones
by ssokolow on Wed 24th Oct 2012 02:34
in reply to "RE[2]: Comment by stabbyjones"
Well, Gnome3 wasn't a change that anyone really wanted.
In the name of fairness, I should point out that I was a happy KDE 3.5 user, couldn't stand the bugs and sluggishness in KDE 4.2 through 4.5 and switched to LXDE when the GNOME guys finally fixed the performance issues in the GTK+ Open/Save dialog. (for folders with many files in them)
As a former Gentoo user, I don't think in terms of "THE Linux Desktop Environment" and I think about GNOME 3 about as often as I do CDE.
When I talk about the Linux desktop regressing, I'm speaking purely about how client-side window decorations are to window management as cooperative multi-tasking is to concurrency. (Useful when done properly... but not even NASA can guarantee a bug-free program.)
Edited 2012-10-24 02:38 UTC
RE[4]: Comment by stabbyjones
by Soulbender on Wed 24th Oct 2012 04:08
in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by stabbyjones"
RE[4]: Comment by stabbyjones
by dorin.lazar on Fri 26th Oct 2012 03:38
in reply to "RE[3]: Comment by stabbyjones"





Member since:
2006-01-14
Well, Gnome3 wasn't a change that anyone really wanted. Wayland aims at fixing something everyone knows needs fixing. That plus its being aimed at Fedora and eventually RHEL. Others can choose not to use it, but they will be giving up a lot of compatibility to do so. Apps will start to be ported over to Wayland support, making anyone without Wayland a dying breed. Unless of course it sucks. Then it just won't go anywhere.