Login to OSNews
Username or Email
Which Linux Distro is Best?
on Mon 22nd Oct 2012 04:51 UTC
Here's a topic guaranteed to start controversy. Which Linux distribution is best? It all depends on your criteria for judging. Even then the topic is highly subjective. Here are a few nominees for "best distro" in specific categories.
Thread beginning with comment 539891
To view parent comment,
To read all comments associated with this story, please
RE: Best Linux distro
on Wed 24th Oct 2012 14:16 UTC in reply to "
RE: Best Linux distro
General users do run TomTom and Android, which is what I was specifically talking about.
And I was talking about users who run their own Linux on their routers.
Your anecdotal evidence is skewed as it defies all logic. You cannot be a "general user" who cannot even manage Ubuntu yet still skilled enough to hack a router to install customised *nix firmware.
Calling it "hack" is a misrepresentation. In fact, the install process typically goes like this:
1. Download precompiled firmware image,
2. Open your router's web interface, navigate to firmware update and select the downloaded image.
That's it! You now have a router that is every single bit as functional and comfortable to use as before. Just more stable and with some extra functions.
There's a huge mismatch of skill levels being discussed there so I can only conclude that you and your mates are in the minority.
I think you are wrong assuming that the reason why they won't install Linux on their desktops is lack of skill. Sufficiently user-friendly distros and installers now exist. It is just that on the desktop, Linux does not fit their use case: Poor hardware support and lack of MS Office are most often cited.
Furthermore, the reason I excluded users that just interact with a web interface is because (and I repeat) it's literally no different to logging onto Facebook; which also runs on Linux servers. So if using a web server was as equal to running Linux as literally having Slackware installed on your laptop, then that would make every single internet connected individual a Linux user. Clearly that's just absurd, thus the logical reasoning is that web users are discounted from discussion.
The difference being that they own the computer and the router. And they don't own Facebook's servers, much less installing their own Linux on them.
Sign Up For The OSNews Newsletter!
Friends & Fans
OSNews Privacy Statement
Notice to Bulk Emailers
© 1997-2013 OSNews Inc. All Rights Reserved. OSNews and the OSNews logo are trademarks of OSNews.
Source Code © 2007-2013,
, except where noted
Reader comments are owned by the poster. We are not responsible for them in any way.
All trademarks, icons, and logos shown or mentioned in this web site are the property of their respective owners.
OSNews.com uses icons from the
© 2008 John Resig
Reproduction of OSNews stories is permitted only with explicit authorization from OSNews. Reproductions must be properly credited.