Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 25th Oct 2012 20:50 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 540190
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[8]: I'd rather put my head in an oven.
by WorknMan on Fri 26th Oct 2012 23:04
in reply to "RE[7]: I'd rather put my head in an oven."
That's true right now, but it'll stop being true when there are Metro/Modern apps that I need to run. That was my point.
Well, you're certainly not going to be running those on Windows 7
Your refusal not to adopt Windows 8 in hopes that it will just go away won't make a damn bit of difference. It'll be like those 5 people who switched to Linux because of Windows XP's product activation. Wow, that really put the fear of god in MS, didn't it?
So, if the other non-Metro features appeal to you, might as well pony up the $40 and make the jump. As for the rest of your post, it appears that you are looking at this 1.0 release and pre-judging what the UI will look and behave like in 10 years. As Android has already shown us, the apps and UI don't have to look and behave EXACTLY the same way on a tablet as they do on a phone. Hence, there's no reason why MS couldn't build in some additional functionality when you're running a desktop and/or operating a keyboard and mouse. Already on Android, they've got some apps that can 'float' above others, so multi-window support is certainly not an impossibility. Besides, there's no way in hell they could port Visual Studio to an interface like Metro as it is now, and they would HAVE to port it before they could axe the desktop entirely.




Member since:
2005-11-16
That's true right now, but it'll stop being true when there are Metro/Modern apps that I need to run. That was my point.
Metro/Modern will always be compromised on the desktop by its need to work well on small, finger operated, touch-screen tablets. In user interface design one size definitely doesn't fit all.
While it may improve in future versions, I see little chance of full desktop functionality being added to this touch/tablet focussed UI. At best I think there'll be an improved version of 'snap', with apps able to be split more flexibly.
I rarely run software full screen. I use multiple windows and the full window management features provided by the traditional desktop. Anything less than that is a major downgrade.
I think those of us who don't want a restrictive tablet interface running on our large screen desktop PCs will notice too.