Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 29th Oct 2012 23:34 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 540471
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Depends on your definition of "viable"
by galvanash on Tue 30th Oct 2012 03:57
in reply to "RE[2]: Depends on your definition of "viable""
RE[3]: Depends on your definition of "viable"
by lucas_maximus on Tue 30th Oct 2012 21:41
in reply to "RE[2]: Depends on your definition of "viable""




Member since:
2005-11-13
Microsoft also tends to change its mind every few years too. Didn't they 'bet the company' on .NET/Silverlight, or some shit?
Win32 will be around for at LEAST another 20 years. That's about how long it'll take 'em to make Metro not suck