
"Google's quest to guess what we want before we want it has produced an unusual side effect: a disparity in the results the company presents about the presidential candidates.
A Wall Street Journal examination found that the search engine often customizes the results of people who have recently searched for 'Obama' - but not those who have recently searched for 'Romney'." A
confirmation bias' wet dream, this. The confirmation bias is already one of the root psychological causes of much of the problems in the world as it is - we really shouldn't have technology companies make it worse. Technology - and more specifically, the internet -
should fight this bias, not affirm it.
Member since:
2011-01-28
Thom Holwerda,
"That's why I used a Google link. Should be accessible through that, right?"
Doesn't work for me. I disabled all blockers and still a no go. I tried to do the search directly from google, still not accessible.
I know what your talking about though, some news sites had a policy in place to enable one person to read the article from search engines, but when he'd send the link to others they'd have to pay.
Edit: To clarify, a paragraph excerpt is readable, but there's a link about becoming a subscriber to continue reading. Clicking that link shows a page that asks the user to become a 3 month subscriber for $22.
Edited 2012-11-06 17:27 UTC