Linked by Howard Fosdick on Thu 8th Nov 2012 02:24 UTC
Windows Microsoft is discontinuing Windows Live Messenger in 1st quarter 2013, forcing users to switch to Skype. Most would want to switch to Skype anyway with its more advanced capabilities, and the switch makes sense to Microsoft, since they purchased Skype for $8.5 billion last year. However, the move may be seen as typical Redmondian high-handedness by those using Messenger with dial-up. Technically Skype works with dial-up but in practice most agree you really need broadband for decent use. Will everyone view Messenger as replaceable by Skype?
Thread beginning with comment 541462
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Could it be fixed?
by Trenien on Thu 8th Nov 2012 16:33 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Could it be fixed?"
Member since:

Well, it actually began to worsen before skype was bought by microsoft. So, although I've no love for redmond's giant (and that's saying it nicely), I don't think they can be held accountable for that one.

Reply Parent Score: 1