Linked by Howard Fosdick on Thu 8th Nov 2012 20:12 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 541540
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Well, my point was more that we don't need it because it's already there.
I took it from your critique of the SSN that you'd prefer it didn't exist, but now I understand better, thanks for clarifying.
That's what I meant by oppressive, which is why I chose that particular word rather than repressive. They actually have different meanings though the former is often misused to convey the latter.
That word can have several meanings and its use to describe an unjust or tyrannical government is common: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/oppressive?s=t
In any case, I get your point.
It's not that I preferred it didn't exist, I just wish it was limited in use to its original intention as proof of eligibility for Social Security benefits. The fact that we use it for credit tracking alone opens the door to abuse and fraud. We are conditioned to give it out on command when we should be taught to do the opposite.





Member since:
2005-06-29
Well, my point was more that we don't need it because it's already there. Our government is complicated enough without yet another unnecessary burden on the citizens. That's what I meant by oppressive, which is why I chose that particular word rather than repressive. They actually have different meanings though the former is often misused to convey the latter.