Linked by pepa on Fri 9th Nov 2012 23:18 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 541724
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I'm split between that and KDE/Qt, but I don't like the object disoriented obfuscation. Actually Qt isn't that bad, I use it as one of two good class libraries (the other is Apple's IOKit where things like CD, DVD, etc. and USB, Firewire extend SCSI).
Qt itself isn't bad, it's great for developing cross-platform stuff, for example, but I personally can't stand KDE. KDE is just... it's all over the god damn place, there's gazillion redundant features and options there, and there's literally no consistency there: just take a look at how many different places are theming-settings spread over, how many tabs and options are constantly visible in those, and how in some places the system offers you the option for KDE to automatically download and install themes you choose, in an other place the system only allows you to install from local filesystem, and in some places you have to drop to the command-line to install the themes!
I would love a DE with similar approach and values as the GNOME 2 had, but with Qt as the toolkit. Then again, I only use Linux on servers or in a VM, so maybe my opinion just doesn't count.
Have you seen http://razor-qt.org/ as yet? Might be along the lines of what you're chasing.
KDE is just... it's all over the god damn place, there's gazillion redundant features and options there, and there's literally no consistency there: just take a look at how many different places are theming-settings spread over, how many tabs and options are constantly visible in those, and how in some places the system offers you the option for KDE to automatically download and install themes you choose, in an other place the system only allows you to install from local filesystem, and in some places you have to drop to the command-line to install the themes!
I haven't got the vaguest idea what you're looking at be honest, but it ain't KDE. The theme stuff is all from the same place because KDE uses a really novel thing called component reuse.
Mind you, I've heard this repeated many times pretty much ad hominem over many years.
I think Linus prefers it too.
No, he doesn't. He prefers Gnome 3:
"Torvalds has switched back to GNOME 3 as he reckons the desktop GUI's problems are being fixed. “It has been getting less painful. They have extensions that are still too hard to find. You can make your desktop look almost as good as it did two years ago.”"
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/11/07/passion_of_torvalds/
Edited 2012-11-10 07:30 UTC
I guess you're a bit outdated. Linus is using KDE currently, he had enough of GNOME already.
https://plus.google.com/u/0/+LinusTorvalds/posts/DbmEE8kXLDA
The second link mentions that Unity, LXDE, XFCE will be affected since they reuse some of the fallback components. When the whole Gnome3 mess erupted I initially tried XFCE for a while, but missed a number of important things, so I went for fallback. Now I'm going to avoid GTK stuff a whole lot more, so XFCE won't be my first stop.





Member since:
2010-05-06
I think Linus prefers it too.
I'm split between that and KDE/Qt, but I don't like the object disoriented obfuscation. Actually Qt isn't that bad, I use it as one of two good class libraries (the other is Apple's IOKit where things like CD, DVD, etc. and USB, Firewire extend SCSI).
Gnome is broken. The developers make strange, huge, arbitrary changes on a whim. I don't know why, only that everything breaks or is unfamiliar. I can't get wireless (Network-mis-Manager, or even freaking bluetooth PINs) to work properly.