Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sat 10th Nov 2012 01:41 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 541772
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Comment by Drumhellar
by UltraZelda64 on Sat 10th Nov 2012 07:26
in reply to "RE[4]: Comment by Drumhellar"
Really? The bandwidth of a smallish image is your big concern? I mean, all the content that is dynamically loaded as you use the app, constantly updated, and you're worried about, at most, 100KB?
You're grasping for straws.
You're grasping for straws.
Look, the simple fact is that I am completely and utterly against advertising running directly on my computer. I own the machine, and I own the operating system (or a license to it) to be able to run my computer. It is my machine--my property--and I want to run it as I see fit. I am completely against giving free money to companies in the form of automatically-downloaded advertisements directly in the software of my machine, whether it heavily affects me or not.
It's MY computer, thank you very much--I don't need any tips on what shampoo to buy next week (actually, some shampoo was the other ad I remember IIRC--how unfitting and ironic). And I do not want indirectly help to rake in money to some third-party cosmetics and beauty company that I don't give a damn about just for the privilege of using my computer. The simple fact is, if you keep scrolling to the end of, for example, the weather "app," you'll see the ad.
The good thing is, they are avoidable--just avoid the Metro interface and its craptastic "apps" completely. But the fact is, in my testing, I found myself repeatedly being subjected to these ads, far more times than I would like. I have, as usual, made it a point to mentally "block" the ads, so I purposely forgot the exact products; yes, I hate advertising that much. I quickly abandoned further playing around inside Metro after seeing the ads, and went straight for the desktop.
Edited 2012-11-10 07:39 UTC
RE[6]: Comment by Drumhellar
by modmans2ndcoming on Sat 10th Nov 2012 14:30
in reply to "RE[5]: Comment by Drumhellar"
Why are you not complaining about that cable subscription that you pay hundreds a year for and are inundated with ads on YOUR tv?
Why not complain about that movie you saw where you paid 30-40 dollars in ticket and concessions and are seeing ads in the pre-roll?
Ads are everywhere....you don't want Ads? If it is sooooo onerous for you to have to pay with your impressions for data services you are using, go to Linux.
RE[5]: Comment by Drumhellar
by Lorin on Sat 10th Nov 2012 07:43
in reply to "RE[4]: Comment by Drumhellar"
RE[6]: Comment by Drumhellar
by UltraZelda64 on Sat 10th Nov 2012 08:01
in reply to "RE[5]: Comment by Drumhellar"
100 kb times the thousands of potential pictures
Yep, exactly. That, plus the $$$ that goes directly to the company whose product is being advertised, from the countless hundreds of megabytes (or even gigabytes) that are sent out in the form of millions of individual 100KB streams of data.
And then what do the companies do after they've suckered their audience into buying their products? Well, they pocket the change and raise the prices of their products, of course! You know, pass that extra wasted money they blew on advertising their products right back onto their customers to make us pay for their brainwashing of the masses.
I really hope no one thinks that advertising is free and that the sale surges that it causes will actually lower the price of a company's products... after all, the products by the name-brand mega corporations with mega marketing budgets tend to sell their prices at much higher prices than the rest of their competition. It's plain as day, right now, at any supermarket you walk into.
Edited 2012-11-10 08:04 UTC
RE[6]: Comment by Drumhellar
by lucas_maximus on Sat 10th Nov 2012 15:28
in reply to "RE[5]: Comment by Drumhellar"





Member since:
2005-07-12
Really? The bandwidth of a smallish image is your big concern? I mean, all the content that is dynamically loaded as you use the app, constantly updated, and you're worried about, at most, 100KB?
You're grasping for straws.