Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 11th Nov 2012 15:49 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 542092
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Comment by marcp
by WereCatf on Mon 12th Nov 2012 08:52
in reply to "RE[4]: Comment by marcp"
There's simply no such thing as absolute freedom - there will always be contention.
Indeed. True, fully complete, unadulterated freedom is in and of itself an oxymoron: it would mean you have the freedom to reign over anything and everyone else while at the same time having the freedom not to be reigned over yourself by anyone or anything -- you simply cannot have both at the same time. As such freedom in the real, material world will always be a subset of the actual philosophical concept of freedom, there is simply no way of fully fitting an all-encompassing, philosophical concept into a world that is governed by physics, not philosophy.
With the aforementioned in mind it's silly to try to claim one's approach to freedom is the best one as it is still affected by one's values, culture and various kinds of limitations imposed by the government and plain, old physics. Debating which approach is better -- not the best -- is certainly acceptable, but one really needs to keep in mind that they are still merely projections of something that is unobtainable and therefore they will always come short.




Member since:
2007-02-18
There's the definition, and there's the actual concept and its effects. Like it or not, the real world doesn't care how freedom is defined. What matters is what you actually get as a result.
In some cases, the result you get with GPL licence is more beneficial than BSD.
What's creepy is that people consider freedom to include "freedom to screw others over". There's simply no such thing as absolute freedom - there will always be contention. Ultimately there is a choice between GPL and BSD that anyone can make so it's disturbing how people can view the existence of something contrary to their ideas as somehow personally affecting them.