Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 11th Nov 2012 15:49 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 542189
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[8]: Comment by marcp
by lucas_maximus on Mon 12th Nov 2012 21:04
in reply to "RE[7]: Comment by marcp"
It isn't directly less free for the end-user but the result is less free eventually.
No it isn't ... the result is still free.
The proprietary fork of a BSD project will attract more users because of the added features and polish. Things like QA testing and documentation, which are often sadly lacking in unfunded open source projects.
No shit. It still doesn't mean the BSD project is less free.
As time goes on the original BSD project becomes the unloved poor relative that no one actually wants to use so the choice becomes the "freedom" to use old crap or proprietary good stuff.
There is no evidence of this.
Apple has contributed code back to BSD projects, I believe Google has and other companies.
It depends whether keeping the code BSD is in the companies interest or not (just like keeping it GPL can be as well).
Both have their places.
Believing in black and white realities, when everything is a shade of grey ... hurts every community and stop communication between the two and an exchange of ideas.
It becomes repetitive and pointless.
Edited 2012-11-12 21:11 UTC
"As time goes on the original BSD project becomes the unloved poor relative that no one actually wants to use so the choice becomes the "freedom" to use old crap or proprietary good stuff.
There is no evidence of this. " Where is the original 4.4BSD Portable C Compiler then?
It bit-rotted while proprietary compilers based on it and then GCC replaced it. Even the BSD projects couldn't bring themselves to keep using it.





Member since:
2005-07-20
It isn't directly less free for the end-user but the result is less free eventually.
The proprietary fork of a BSD project will attract more users because of the added features and polish. Things like QA testing and documentation, which are often sadly lacking in unfunded open source projects.
As time goes on the original BSD project becomes the unloved poor relative that no one actually wants to use so the choice becomes the "freedom" to use old crap or proprietary good stuff.