Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 13th Nov 2012 16:15 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 542362
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Also worth noting:
by cdude on Tue 13th Nov 2012 18:11
in reply to "RE[3]: Also worth noting:"
Why hate? There is gray between black and white. Like those that will buy a Surface but prefer win32 compatibility and hence buy Surface x86 rather then Surface RT.
That's the whole deal. Microsoft offers you two near identicial (price, feel, look, name) products. The one runs all those Windows applications out there and allows non-app-market installations, the other not. Why would you buy the later one?
Edited 2012-11-13 18:15 UTC
RE[5]: Also worth noting:
by ze_jerkface on Tue 13th Nov 2012 18:54
in reply to "RE[4]: Also worth noting:"
Why hate?
I was actually talking about Windows 8.
Surface RT is a lousy idea as well. A Windows tablet that doesn't run Windows programs at a price higher than Android tablets. Just awful. Oh and a name that confuses consumers to top it off. Sinofsky is a clueless hack and developers were right about him from the beginning.
RE[5]: Also worth noting:
by viton on Thu 15th Nov 2012 20:01
in reply to "RE[4]: Also worth noting:"





Member since:
2012-06-22
These statements are meaningless without actual numbers.
We do know that pre-release install rates were low
http://www.neowin.net/news/windows-8-has-five-times-less-pre-releas...
You don't release a product that half the public immediately hates. Freaking stupid.